Effects of Pension Plan Changes


Introduction

Since 2009, fiscal constraints have forced state governments to reduce costs, often by laying off or furloughing employees, imposing salary freezes and/or reducing benefits. In fact, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, since 2009, more than 45 states have made significant changes to their retirement plans, including increasing employee contributions, reducing benefits, or both. Other states have modified their plan design, choosing to transfer more of the risk associated with providing retirement benefits from the state and its political subdivisions to its employees.

While we know a great deal about the unfunded liabilities of public pension plans, we know little about the effects pension plan changes will have on the retirement income of public employees.

This report calculates the retirement income state and participating local employees hired under the new benefit conditions may expect, and compares it with the retirement income they would have earned before the plan was changed. The report also summarizes interviews conducted with state human resource executives and retirement experts from 10 states that have made significant pension plan changes.

 

Date published

April 25, 2014

Contact

Alex Brown, Research Manager
 

Download report

Press release


Become A Member

Becoming a member of NASRA offers a unique opportunity to join a community committed to the sound, efficient, and innovative stewardship of public retirement systems. Membership connects you with a network of professionals and experts, providing valuable insights into managing public retirement systems with a focus on sustainability and risk-averse strategies.

By joining NASRA, you gain the tools and resources to enhance the management of public retirement systems, ensuring their long-term success and reliability for generations to come.

What's New at NASRA: Updated Cost of Living Issue Brief

Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) play a significant role in public pensions. They help retirees keep up with rising prices, but they also add costs to pension plans. Policymakers and plan sponsors are tasked with balancing three things: benefits adequacy, plan sustainability, and affordability for members and plan sponsors.
The recent increase in inflation caused many policymakers and, in some cases pension trustees, to review how benefits are designed and paid for, including the way COLAs are granted and funded. NASRA’s recently updated issue brief on the lates trends in COLAs is available in the NASRA Research Center.