Click here for media inquiries
and speaking requests

Florida

Overview

The Florida Retirement System (FRS) offers two plans for members to select as a primary benefit: FRS Pension Plan (defined benefit) and FRS Investment Plan (defined contribution). Since 2000, new employees can choose between the two plans to select as a primary benefit. The Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement (division), administers most pension and retirement benefits in the state of Florida, including a defined contribution plan for the State University System. The FRS covers general employees, public safety employees, and teachers. A separate state agency, the State Board of Administration, administers the FRS Investment Plan and manages all FRS assets.  

Plan Design

State employees and teachers, and employees of local governments participating in the FRS, have the option to participate in a defined benefit or defined contribution plan. The DC plan has been the default option for new hires since January 1, 2018.

According to the US Government Accountability Office, 95 percent of employees of state and local government in Florida participate in Social Security.

Access plan design detail

Authorizing Statutes and Board Structure

FL Stat § 121.011 establishes the Florida Retirement System as a consolidation of existing retirement systems for state and county employees and teachers. 

The FRS is a department of the state Department of Management Services, whose director reports to the governor. There is no board overseeing the FRS.  

Details regarding the composition of these and other retirement boards is accessible via the Retirement and Investment Board Characteristics search tool located at the bottom of this page.

Fiduciary Duty/Prudence Standard

FL Stat § 215.47(c) states

Investments made by the State Board of Administration shall be designed to maximize the financial return to the fund consistent with the risks incumbent in each investment and shall be designed to preserve an appropriate diversification of the portfolio. The board shall discharge its duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of its participants and beneficiaries. The board in performing the above investment duties shall comply with the fiduciary standards set forth in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 at 29 U.S.C. s. 1104(a)(1)(A) through (C). Except as provided in paragraph (b), in case of conflict with other provisions of law authorizing investments, the investment and fiduciary standards set forth in this paragraph prevail.

Legal Protections of Retirement Benefits

Article I, Section 10 of the Florida Constitution provides that no law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed. This constitutional provision has been interpreted by the courts to protect vested pension benefits. Once an individual attains eligibility for a retirement benefit, the benefit is afforded constitutional protection. Case law interprets the impairment of contract protections in Art. I, §10 to permit only prospective adjustments to pension benefits. Florida Sheriff's Association v. Department of Administration, 408 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 1981); State ex rei. Stringer v. Lee, 2 So.2d 127 (1941); Anders v. Nicholson, 150 So. 639(Fla. 1933); O'Connell v. State Dept. of Admin, 557 So.2d 609 (Fla. App. 3 Dist. Feb. 2006)(holding that benefits vested upon attainment of normal retirement eligibility). In 2012, a state court trial judge in Williams v. Scott (Case No. 2011CA1584) struck down amendments to the state retirement system that increased the employee contribution and eliminated the COLA for future years of service. (FL CONST., Article I, §10) Source: Robert Klausner, Esq., State Constitutional Protections for Public Sector Retirement Benefits

See also the following search tools:

Retirement System Account Interest Policies Economic Actuarial Assumptions Retirement and Investment Board Characteristics
Information about interest rates applied to account balances of inactive plan participants Assumed rates of investment return and inflation Composition and characteristics of public retirement and investment oversight boards
Mortality Assumptions Plan Design Features Post-retirement Employment Policies
Public retirement system actuarial assumptions for mortality Numerous elements of retirement plan design Policies governing return-to-work for retirement system annuitants

More Data

Flag of Florida (September 24, 1900)

Population (2025) 23,462,518

Florida public pension statistics,
per U.S. Census Bureau as of FY 2025

Assets

$263.3 billion

Active Members

755,646

Annuitants

547,469

Benefits Paid

$16.4 billion

Employee Contributions

$1.2 billion

Employer Contributions

$7.8 billion

Systems

One state system that accounts for 81 percent of assets and 88 percent of public pension plan participants in the state. The Census Bureau also reports 461 local systems.

More Data

Other Resources


Become A Member

Becoming a member of NASRA offers a unique opportunity to join a community committed to the sound, efficient, and innovative stewardship of public retirement systems. Membership connects you with a network of professionals and experts, providing valuable insights into managing public retirement systems with a focus on sustainability and risk-averse strategies.

By joining NASRA, you gain the tools and resources to enhance the management of public retirement systems, ensuring their long-term success and reliability for generations to come.

What's New at NASRA: Government Spending Issue Brief

NASRA’s March 2026 update on government spending makes a basic but important point: public pension benefits are not paid out of a government’s day-to-day operating budget. They are paid from trust funds that employees and employers contribute to during an employee’s working years. Those trusts distribute more than $400 billion each year to retirees and beneficiaries in communities across the country. On a national basis, employer contributions to pension trusts in FY 2023 equaled 5.16 percent of direct general spending by state and local governments, which shows that pension contributions remain a limited share of overall public spending even though the level varies from one state to another. 
The brief also shows that pension costs should be viewed in the context of the changes governments have made over the past 15 years to strengthen plan funding. Following the 2008–09 market decline, nearly every state and many local governments adjusted contributions, benefits, or both to improve pension sustainability. More recent data show that employer contributions increased from FY 2022 to FY 2023, but pension spending as a share of total government spending remained broadly stable. The updated brief provides FY 2023 figures and also projects the aggregate pension spending rate for FY 2024, offering a useful snapshot of both current costs and the longer funding trend.