Public retirement systems manage a variety of risks, including those relating to investments, operational issues, and the funding or financing of pension benefits. Identifying and measuring these risks is key to successful administration of a retirement system. This page focuses on risk assessment concerning funding and financing of public pension benefits.
Actuarial Standard of Practice (ASOP) No. 51, Assessment and Disclosure of Risk Associated with Measuring Pension Obligations and Determining Pension Plan Contributions, defines risk as "The potential of actual future measurements deviating from expected future measurements resulting from actual future experience deviating from actuarially assumed experience." ASOP 51 requires the actuary to conduct a risk assessment of the pension plan when performing a funding valuation of the plan.
Public pension risk assessment can be composed of any combination of the following:
Inputs | Outputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 51 defines a sensitivity test as a process for assessing the impact of a change in an actuarial assumption on an actuarial measurement. A sensitivity analysis typically focuses on a handful of actuarial assumptions that are most consequential to the condition of a pension plan. These assumptions typically include those for investment return, inflation, population growth, payroll growth, and employer contribution effort.
New GASB standards, Statements 67 and 68, require plans to calculate and report their funding level based on a projected investment return of plus and minus one percent from their assumed investment return; this also is a basic form of sensitivity testing.
Public pension risk assessment is required by statute in some states, while most other systems perform them via their own volition, without a statutory requirement and under various monikers. The factors and methods used to conduct risk assessments also vary. Below are listed some examples of published public pension risk assessments.
CalPERS
CalSTRS
Connecticut
Hawaii
North Carolina
Pennsylvania
Virginia
Washington
Review of ASOP No. 51, GRS Consulting, November 2018
Better Measurements: Risk Reporting for Public Pension Plans, 2019
Foundation for Public Pension Risk Reporting, Pew Charitable Trusts
Model Disclosure Elements for Actuarial Valuation Reports on Public Retirement Systems in California, California Actuarial Advisory Panel
A Survey of Public Plan Maturity Measures, Cheiron, Fall 2018
Communicating Defined Benefit Risk, Society of Actuaries