The Market Value of Liabilities Issue
 
 
A movement is afoot to require public pension plans to calculate and publish their market value of liabilities, a figure akin to a plan's termination liability. MVL is determined by using a) a "risk-free" rate of investment return--generally around four to five percent--to discount liabilities, rather than a return based on a diversified portfolio, which is 7.5 percent to 8.5 percent for most public pension plans; and b) the accumulated benefit obligation, which accounts for liabilities accrued to-date, rather than the pension benefit obligation, which projects future service and salary growth.  Corporate pension plans are required to calculate a MVL, chiefly so that in the case of bankruptcy or sale of the firm, the plan's liabilities are known. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board is studying the issue of how public pension liabilities are calculated and disclosed, as mandated in its Statements 25 and 27. Possible changes to these standards may include elements of MVL.

NASRA Resolution on Public Employee Retirement System Accounting Standards and Actuarial Methodologies
Papers Presented at the Society of Actuaries Public Pension Finance Symposium, May 2009
The Rationale for Traditional Actuarial Models, Brian Murphy, Norm Jones, and Paul Zorn, presented at the SOA Public Pension Finance Symposium, May 2009
NASRA White Paper: Public Pensions and Market Value of Liabilities
Ensuring Realistic Employer Costs for Retirement Plans: Why “Market Value of Liabilities" Makes No Sense for Governmental Accounting, National Education Association
Oral and Written Statements Submitted to American Academy of Actuaries Public Interest Committee Forum
Joint Letter and Statement to American Academy of Actuaries Board of Directors
Why Public Sector Accounting and Financial Reporting Is--And Should Be--Different, Governmental Accounting Standards Board
The Pension Actuary's Guide to Financial Economics, Joint AAA/SOA Task Force on Financial Economics and the Actuarial Model
An "ASOP" Fable: The Illusion of Market Value, Gary Findlay, MOSERS,
The Advantages of Using Conventional Actuarial Approaches for Valuing Public Pension Plans, NCPERS and Paul Zorn
The Financial Economics Debate, and The Need for a New Way Forward, Dimitry Mindlin, CDI Advisors
Why Pension MVL is a Misapplication of Financial Economics, Daniel P. Moore, FSA, EA.
The Case for Stocks in Pension Funds, David T. Kausch, FSA, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Co.
The Case Against Stock in Public Pension Funds, Lawrence N. Bader and Jeremy Gold
The Case For Marking Public Pension Plan Liabilities to Market, Jeremy Gold and Gordon Latter
Financial Economics and Public Retirement Systems, Presentation by Paul Angelo of The Segal Company
What Ails Public Pensions? And What Can Be Done to Strengthen Them?, Richard Ennis, CFA, Ennis Knupp & Associates, Inc.
Valuing Public Pension Plans: Comparing Financial Economics With Conventional Approaches, GRS Insight, April 2008
Liability Aware Investing for Defined Benefit Pension Funds, Armand Yamboa, FSA, Ennis Knupp & Associates, Inc.
The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly of Pension Accounting, Dimitry Mindlin, CDI Advisors
In Support of the Weatherman, Dimitry Mindlin, CDI Advisors
Windmill Fighters in Potemkin Villages, Dimitry Mindlin, CDI Advisors
The Case for Stochastic Present Values, Dimitry Mindlin, CDI Advisors
Press Release: PBGC Announces New Investment Policy